Kannel SMPP interface !

[Himalay Gopu]

Hi list,
Is there anyway i can use SMPP or UCP interface to send SMS instead of http interface
It might seem wierd but is it possible

Any ideas

Himalay

[Shridhar Raju]

Hi Himalaya,

If you are talking about interface to connect to SMSCs, then Kannel has got both protocol support.

But if you are talking about sendsms HTTP interface of kannel, then why do you need SMPP interface for that purpose. Still you want your client to send SM using those protocol, then directly connect to SMSC.

Hope this helps you.
Hi list,
Is there anyway i can use SMPP or UCP interface to send SMS instead of http interface
It might seem wierd but is it possible

Any ideas

Himalay

[Himalay Gopu]

list
Is there any open source SMPP / EMI server available
I would like to integrate it with Kannels bearerbox

Regards
Himalay



-----Original Message-----
From: Rachman Chavik [mailto:***@attglobal.net]
Sent: Friday, June 06, 2003 12:21 PM
To: Himalay Gopu
Subject: RE: Kannel SMPP interface !

But I want a SMPP server for testing so i dont think i can go for a
comercial product rite now

Ah, that's fine.

Is there any open source SMPP server available ? ( even a
downsized version , to get the hang of it)

Check http://smsforum.net/smpp_tools.html, look at the SCCT tool.

CMG or logica had a similar product, but I could'nt their download link after they've merged.



Regards,

Rachman Chavik

[Kwok Peng Tuck]

The logica stuff is here :
http://opensmpp.logica.com/

A smpp smsc simulator is available as well. You can connect kannel to it
and kannel will receive correct response from the simulator.
MO simulation is possible.

Post by Himalay Gopu
list
Is there any open source SMPP / EMI server available
I would like to integrate it with Kannels bearerbox
Regards
Himalay
-----Original Message-----
*Sent:* Friday, June 06, 2003 12:21 PM
*To:* Himalay Gopu
*Subject:* RE: Kannel SMPP interface !

But I want a SMPP server for testing so i dont think i can go for a
comercial product rite now

Ah, that's fine.

Is there any open source SMPP server available ? ( even a
downsized version , to get the hang of it)

Check http://smsforum.net/smpp_tools.html, look at the SCCT tool.
CMG or logica had a similar product, but I could'nt their download
link after they've merged.
Regards,
Rachman Chavik

[Stipe Tolj]

yes there is. We at Wapme have those beasts arround here still in
cages ;)

Reason: We need a modularized configure/make process to have them
hooked in cleanly and keep them seperated in own cvs modules.

So could some people *please* think of how to handle configure/make of
"external" cvs modules with the gateway cvs module as base core.

Stipe

***@wapme-systems.de
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Wapme Systems AG

Vogelsanger Weg 80
40470 Düsseldorf

Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]

E-Mail: ***@wapme-systems.de
Internet: http://www.wapme-systems.de
-------------------------------------------------------------------
wapme.net - wherever you are

[Aarno Syvänen]

You mean making cvs modules located in different machines ?

Aarno

Post by Stipe Tolj
yes there is. We at Wapme have those beasts arround here still in
cages ;)
Reason: We need a modularized configure/make process to have them
hooked in cleanly and keep them seperated in own cvs modules.
So could some people *please* think of how to handle configure/make of
"external" cvs modules with the gateway cvs module as base core.
Stipe
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Wapme Systems AG
Vogelsanger Weg 80
40470 Düsseldorf
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Internet: http://www.wapme-systems.de
-------------------------------------------------------------------
wapme.net - wherever you are

[Alex Judd]

No, I think Stipe's on about the discussions to build a more module based
build with bearerbox forming the core - ie.

- smsbox
- wapbox
bearerbox - smppbox
- etc.

if we split the modules out a little cleaner like this, then you can
checkout just the base and the module you want.

It shouldn't be a big job, just need to freeze a cvs branch while someone
starts it would be my thoughts. It would be a good incentive to get Wapme to
let loose the smppbox they've got chained there :)

Alex

----- Original Message -----
From: "Aarno Syvänen" <***@gni.ch>
To: "Stipe Tolj" <***@wapme-systems.de>
Cc: <***@kannel.org>
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2003 9:48 AM
Subject: Re: Kannel SMPP interface !

Post by Aarno Syvänen
You mean making cvs modules located in different machines ?
Aarno

Post by Stipe Tolj
yes there is. We at Wapme have those beasts arround here still in
cages ;)
Reason: We need a modularized configure/make process to have them
hooked in cleanly and keep them seperated in own cvs modules.
So could some people *please* think of how to handle configure/make of
"external" cvs modules with the gateway cvs module as base core.
Stipe
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Wapme Systems AG
Vogelsanger Weg 80
40470 Düsseldorf
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Internet: http://www.wapme-systems.de
-------------------------------------------------------------------
wapme.net - wherever you are

[Aarno Syvänen]

Then probably separation ppg/pure wap pull would be useful, too.
I think we can freeze after a new release, that would certainly be ok
for me.

Aarno

Post by Alex Judd
No, I think Stipe's on about the discussions to build a more module based
build with bearerbox forming the core - ie.
- smsbox
- wapbox
bearerbox - smppbox
- etc.
if we split the modules out a little cleaner like this, then you can
checkout just the base and the module you want.
It shouldn't be a big job, just need to freeze a cvs branch while someone
starts it would be my thoughts. It would be a good incentive to get Wapme to
let loose the smppbox they've got chained there :)
Alex
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2003 9:48 AM
Subject: Re: Kannel SMPP interface !

Post by Aarno Syvänen
You mean making cvs modules located in different machines ?
Aarno

Post by Stipe Tolj
yes there is. We at Wapme have those beasts arround here still in
cages ;)
Reason: We need a modularized configure/make process to have them
hooked in cleanly and keep them seperated in own cvs modules.
So could some people *please* think of how to handle configure/make of
"external" cvs modules with the gateway cvs module as base core.
Stipe
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Wapme Systems AG
Vogelsanger Weg 80
40470 Düsseldorf
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Internet: http://www.wapme-systems.de
-------------------------------------------------------------------
wapme.net - wherever you are

[Stipe Tolj]

Post by Alex Judd
No, I think Stipe's on about the discussions to build a more module based
build with bearerbox forming the core - ie.
- smsbox
- wapbox
bearerbox - smppbox
- etc.
if we split the modules out a little cleaner like this, then you can
checkout just the base and the module you want.
It shouldn't be a big job, just need to freeze a cvs branch while someone
starts it would be my thoughts. It would be a good incentive to get Wapme to
let loose the smppbox they've got chained there :)

yep, it's waiting to be freed! ;)) same with mmsbox (our MMSC
implementation).

Stipe

***@wapme-systems.de
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Wapme Systems AG

Vogelsanger Weg 80
40470 Düsseldorf

Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]

E-Mail: ***@wapme-systems.de
Internet: http://www.wapme-systems.de
-------------------------------------------------------------------
wapme.net - wherever you are

[Stipe Tolj]

Post by Aarno Syvänen
You mean making cvs modules located in different machines ?

no, I'd like to have the current "gateway" cvs module as the base
component and add-ons (ie. smppbox, emibox, mmsbox) to be extendable
to the gateway source.

Basically something similiar as the Apache guys did with their APR
(apache portable runtime).

Stipe

***@wapme-systems.de
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Wapme Systems AG

Vogelsanger Weg 80
40470 Düsseldorf

Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]

E-Mail: ***@wapme-systems.de
Internet: http://www.wapme-systems.de
-------------------------------------------------------------------
wapme.net - wherever you are

[Nisan Bloch]

Hi

Post by Stipe Tolj
yes there is. We at Wapme have those beasts arround here still in
cages ;)

yeah.. ditto...

Post by Stipe Tolj
So could some people *please* think of how to handle configure/make of
"external" cvs modules with the gateway cvs module as base core.

Here is a very rough idea..
How about keeping it simple.
for the SMSC/bearerbox end - a config file that specifies a smsc_type, and
the entry function names and a .so that we can use dlopen to load.
eg for smpp it could look like this

group=smsc_module
smsc_type=smpp
so_file=smsc_smpp.so
smsc_create=smsc_smpp_create

Then for the "smsbox" end. These are essentially "standalone" apps that
connect to Kannel via bearerbox and send messages.

So I think we should split the gw directory again, much like we split of
gw/smsc

kannel/gwlib
kannel/gw
kannel/smsc
kannel/boxes/smsbox : split out the smsbox
kannel/boxes/wapbox : split out the smsbox
...
Then the
add on boxes can fit into there own kannel/boxes/foobar directory, or even
in a totally separate tree. One could even supply binaries (though
hopefully not) of boxes, or build Kannel support into commercial apps using
libs other than gwlib.

The configure/make can work just like smsbox, wapbox etc do now. When and
as new "front end" modules get added we can add --with-smpp --with-emi
--with-apachemod.........

Nisan

Post by Stipe Tolj
Stipe
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Wapme Systems AG
Vogelsanger Weg 80
40470 Düsseldorf
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Internet: http://www.wapme-systems.de
-------------------------------------------------------------------
wapme.net - wherever you are

[Himalay Gopu]

I went wrong in explaining the problem

But the link is for a SMPP simulator but i would like to have a open source SMPP/EMI server which will inturn connect to Kannels bearerbox which has different SMSC connections configured

Regards,
Himalay

-----Original Message-----
From: devel-***@kannel.org [mailto:devel-***@kannel.org]On Behalf Of
Kwok Peng Tuck
Sent: Saturday, June 07, 2003 4:11 PM
To: ***@kannel.org
Subject: Re: Kannel SMPP interface !


The logica stuff is here :
http://opensmpp.logica.com/

A smpp smsc simulator is available as well. You can connect kannel to it
and kannel will receive correct response from the simulator.
MO simulation is possible.

Post by Himalay Gopu
list
Is there any open source SMPP / EMI server available
I would like to integrate it with Kannels bearerbox
Regards
Himalay
-----Original Message-----
*Sent:* Friday, June 06, 2003 12:21 PM
*To:* Himalay Gopu
*Subject:* RE: Kannel SMPP interface !

But I want a SMPP server for testing so i dont think i can go for a
comercial product rite now

Ah, that's fine.

Is there any open source SMPP server available ? ( even a
downsized version , to get the hang of it)

Check http://smsforum.net/smpp_tools.html, look at the SCCT tool.
CMG or logica had a similar product, but I could'nt their download
link after they've merged.
Regards,
Rachman Chavik

[Stipe Tolj]

Post by Himalay Gopu
I went wrong in explaining the problem
But the link is for a SMPP simulator but i would like to have a open source SMPP/EMI server which will inturn connect to Kannels bearerbox which has different SMSC connections configured

yep, our smppbox and emibox are SMPP servers and EMI server that
connect via smsbox interface to bearerbox and provide full transparent
proxying.

Stipe

***@wapme-systems.de
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Wapme Systems AG

Vogelsanger Weg 80
40470 Düsseldorf

Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]

E-Mail: ***@wapme-systems.de
Internet: http://www.wapme-systems.de
-------------------------------------------------------------------
wapme.net - wherever you are

[Himalay Gopu]

Hi Sridhar,
I would like to bulid a SMPP/EMI interface to faclilate client machines to connect to my Kannel gateway
If i conect to SMSC directly then i will not have flexiblility of choosing route and route my SMS message through any SMSC

Regards,
Himalay

-----Original Message-----
From: devel-***@kannel.org [mailto:devel-***@kannel.org]On Behalf Of Shridhar Raju
Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2003 4:53 PM
To: ***@kannel.org
Subject: Re: Kannel SMPP interface !


Hi Himalaya,

If you are talking about interface to connect to SMSCs, then Kannel has got both protocol support.

But if you are talking about sendsms HTTP interface of kannel, then why do you need SMPP interface for that purpose. Still you want your client to send SM using those protocol, then directly connect to SMSC.

Hope this helps you.

Hi list,
Is there anyway i can use SMPP or UCP interface to send SMS instead of http interface
It might seem wierd but is it possible

Any ideas

Himalay